Mycoremediation as a bioremediation strategy: principles, mechanisms, and applications for the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils

Veronica Rocco 12 Set 2025




1. Introduction
The contamination of soils by heavy metals (HMs), such as cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), chromium (Cr), arsenic (As), and mercury (Hg), represents an environmental issue of global relevance, which has been exacerbated by the intensification of agricultural production. Modern practices, such as the use of pesticides containing arsenic and other metallic compounds, and the extraction of large volumes of water from deep aquifers—often located in volcanic strata rich in these elements—have contributed to a critical accumulation of such contaminants in the soil.


These contaminants are non-biodegradable and tend to accumulate in the food chain, posing serious risks to the health of ecosystems and humans. Conventional remediation methods, including excavation and ex-situ treatment, are often ineffective, economically burdensome, and can irreversibly alter soil structure and fertility. In response to these limitations, bioremediation technologies offer alternative, eco-friendly, and sustainable approaches. Among these, in addition to the use of heavy metal hyperaccumulator plants like Brassicaceae (e.g., Brassica juncea) and sunflowers (Helianthus annuus), scientific interest has turned towards mycoremediation, which leverages the symbiosis between fungi and plant roots. This article aims to analyze in detail the mechanisms by which mycorrhizae act in the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils.


2. Mycorrhizal symbiosis: biological and functional foundations
Mycorrhiza is a mutualistic association between soil fungi and the root system of most plants. This interaction, which evolved over millions of years, is crucial for plant nutrition and resilience in difficult environmental conditions. The fungus, through its network of hyphae, explores a volume of soil significantly greater than that accessible to the roots alone, facilitating the absorption of water and low-mobility nutrients, such as phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N). In return, the plant provides the fungus with carbohydrates produced through photosynthesis.
There are different types of mycorrhizae; the most studied for bioremediation are ectomycorrhizae and endomycorrhizae (particularly arbuscular mycorrhizae, or AM). Ectomycorrhizae form an external mantle on the roots and an intercellular network (Hartig net), while AM develop inside the cortical cells of the roots, forming specialized structures like arbuscules and vesicles.


3. Remediation mechanisms activated by mycorrhizal symbiosis
The ability of mycorrhizae to mitigate the toxicity of heavy metals is based on a complex interaction of physical, chemical, and biological processes, which can be classified as follows:
3.1. Immobilization (Biosorption)
This is the primary mechanism. The fungal biomass, particularly the cell walls of the hyphae, acts as an efficient biosorbent. The cell walls are rich in polysaccharides (like chitin and chitosan), proteins, and melanins that offer numerous binding sites for heavy metal ions. Through ion exchange and surface complexation processes, the fungi sequester and immobilize the heavy metals within their extracellular biomass. This significantly reduces the concentration of free and bioavailable metal ions in the rhizosphere, protecting the host plant from toxic uptake.
3.2. Chelation and secretion of organic acids
Mycorrhizal fungi can secrete a variety of compounds into the soil, including low-molecular-weight organic acids (e.g., citric acid, oxalic acid) and phytochelatins (in specific cases). These compounds bind to soluble metal ions, forming stable complexes that reduce their mobility and bioavailability. The chelation process helps prevent metal leaching into groundwater and keeps contaminants in a non-toxic form.
3.3. Modification of soil pH and enzyme release
The metabolic activity of mycorrhizal fungi can induce changes in the pH of the rhizosphere microenvironment. The secretion of protons or other acidic or alkaline compounds can alter the solubility of heavy metals; for example, increasing the pH in acidic soils can promote the precipitation of some metals, reducing their availability. Some studies also suggest that fungi can release specific enzymes that contribute to the transformation of toxic forms of metals or metalloids (e.g., arsenic) into less harmful forms.
3.4. Increased host plant tolerance
Mycorrhizal symbiosis not only acts on soil remediation but also confers greater tolerance to heavy metal-induced stress on the plant. Mycorrhizae improve the plant's water and nutritional status, making it more robust and resilient. In some cases, fungi can even regulate the transport of metals within the plant, sequestering them in less sensitive cellular compartments (e.g., vacuoles) to minimize damage.

4. Applications and future potential
Mycoremediation represents a promising approach for the remediation of contaminated sites, particularly for phytostabilization, where the goal is to immobilize contaminants in the soil to prevent their dispersion. Although research has already demonstrated the effectiveness of this technique under laboratory and pilot-scale conditions, its large-scale application requires a deeper understanding of the specific interactions between fungi, plants, and contaminants in different environmental contexts. The identification of highly efficient fungal and plant species and their targeted inoculation at contaminated sites represent future challenges. Mycoremediation stands as a key component of an integrated and sustainable approach to environmental recovery, capable of restoring not only the chemical quality of the soil but also its ecological functionality.


5. Bibliography
1. Joner, E. J., Briones, R., & Leyval, C. (2000). Role of mycorrhizal hyphae on the regulation of heavy metal mobility in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32(11), 1651-1655.
2. Khan, A. G. (2006). Mycoremediation of toxic metals: The potential of fungi. In: Soil Remediation with Mycorrhizal Symbioses: A Global Perspective. Springer, Dordrecht.
3. Garbisu, C., & Alkorta, A. (2001). Phytoextraction: A technology for cleaning contaminated soils? Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 1(2), 163-181.
4. Cairney, J. W. G., & Meharg, A. A. (2003). Mycorrhizae, heavy metal-tolerant fungi, and phytoremediation. Journal of the British Mycological Society, 107(1), 165-177.
5. Arias, A. J., & Valdés, C. J. (2010). Mycorrhizae in phytoremediation: A review. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 4(2), 123-134.
Related topics by the same author:
Veronica Rocco 08 Ago 2025 From a Poisonous Plant to a Potential Cancer Drug: The Toxin in the Damara Milk Bush. Scienceonline. 
Veronica Rocco 08 Ago 2025 Euphorbia damarana: identificato l'euphol come principale responsabile della sua tossicità ma anche come potenziale agente antitumorale. Scienzaonline. 
Veronica Rocco 03 Set 2025 A journey through time and resilience: the incredible story of the Welwitschia mirabilis in the Namib desert. Scienceonline 
Veronica Rocco 03 Set 2025 Un viaggio nel tempo e nella resilienza: l'incredibile storia della Welwitschia mirabilis nel deserto del Namib

 

 

Vota questo articolo
(0 Voti)

Lascia un commento

Assicurati di aver digitato tutte le informazioni richieste, evidenziate da un asterisco (*). Non è consentito codice HTML.

 

Scienzaonline con sottotitolo Sciencenew  - Periodico
Autorizzazioni del Tribunale di Roma – diffusioni:
telematica quotidiana 229/2006 del 08/06/2006
mensile per mezzo stampa 293/2003 del 07/07/2003
Scienceonline, Autorizzazione del Tribunale di Roma 228/2006 del 29/05/06
Pubblicato a Roma – Via A. De Viti de Marco, 50 – Direttore Responsabile Guido Donati

Photo Gallery